Outgoing Alex Butwinski sees nuts-and-bolts successes, but ‘nothing sexy’
Park City Councilman Alex Butwinski sees some of the most notable successes of his four years in office as being nuts-and-bolts issues that are critical to the municipal government but perhaps not as visible to Parkites.
And that might be a reason he was defeated in November as he sought a second term. Butwinski leaves the City Council in early January after having served as Park City navigated through the recession and into a more recent period of solid economic numbers locally.
"I had nothing sexy to run on," Butwinski said, describing that the successful construction of a water-treatment plant is not something that will draw the interest of voters even though it is important to the functioning of the city.
Butwinski, 65 years old and a Park Meadows resident, has lived in Park City since 1999. He is a management consultant. Butwinski was especially interested in City Hall’s budget during his four years as the municipal government handled the impacts of the recession.
Butwinski said he is proud of City Hall’s budgeting process, which attempts to match municipal revenues with the levels of service the city offers. He also noted that City Hall’s bond ratings remain high.
"We have money in the bank. That’s a good place to be," Butwinski said.
Some other issues Butwinski is pleased with as he leaves office include:
"I don’t think it resonated with the public how important that is," Butwinski said.
"They weren’t on the radar screen of most people, how significant they are. Big deal, MIDA didn’t come here," Butwinski said.
He said his time on City Council was "incredibly rewarding" and he encouraged people to become involved at City Hall. Butwinski was a City Hall watcher prior to his election, regularly attending meetings as a member of the public. He said he anticipates occasionally attending City Council meetings. Butwinski also said he has been asked to join the boards of several not-for-profit organizations.
Butwinski said his biggest concerns for Park City’s future are the related issues of growth and traffic. He said Park City must shape growth in a fashion that protects the community.
"You can have growth and not lose a small-town feel," he said.
Butwinski acknowledged that he remains disappointed with his defeat on Election Day. He was the third-place finisher with the top two winning seats. The defeat followed a first-place finish for Butwinski in the August primary. He said he perhaps could have further stressed land conservation during the fall campaign and better defined his position on the idea to redevelop Bonanza Park.
"The body of work I had over four years didn’t resonate or didn’t connect with the voters," Butwinski said.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Park City and Summit County make the Park Record's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
A member of the Park City Planning Commission for at least the second time in less than a year spoke publicly about a concept that would financially involve City Hall in a development proposal at Park City Mountain Resort. Planning Commissioner John Phillips did not address the concept in any depth during a lengthy meeting.