Way We Were: A look at prohibition in Park City
‘King Booze’ dethroned and dead
Park City Museum Research Coordinator
The 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution — prohibiting the production, importation, transportation and sale of alcoholic beverages — was ratified in 1920.
It was a culmination of decades of progressive campaigns to reform society, abolish alcoholism and family violence, diminish crime and crack down on saloon-based corruption. It became one of the most hotly debated political movements in the U.S. and, as a crusade, largely failed.
Though the Civil War temporarily sidelined reform campaigns, temperance movements had been gaining ground since the 1850s. The tipping point for widespread national support of prohibition, however, was the onset of World War I.
When the US declared war on Germany in 1917, new justifications for prohibition arose, including the argument that grain, which would otherwise go toward the production of alcohol, should be repurposed for the war effort. President Wilson agreed to support a constitutional amendment, and the legislative ball was set rolling by the end of the year.
National Prohibition was finally implemented in 1920, but Utah and many other states had introduced “dry” legislation on the state level years before. Influenced by political platforms from both major parties, Utah’s government had passed its “dry bill,” as it was called, in February 1917. It went into effect locally on Aug. 1, 1917.
The political climate in the lead-up to Utah’s bill was heated. Park City alone was home to 20 saloons and bars, and alcohol was a prevalent part of life in the mining town.
Both the Democratic and Republican parties had popular factions that supported Prohibition, but Park City worried about a loss of an estimated $22,000 annually to the city budget, money that normally came from the sale of liquor licenses. Anti-prohibition petitions were passed through town and “freely signed.”
Organizations such as the Women’s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) fought hard for Prohibition, on national and local levels. Park City had local temperance societies, and Park Record editor Sam Raddon (a Republican) often published comments supportive of “drys.”
In February 1917, when a short-lived political standoff almost prevented the passage of the statewide Prohibition bill, the Record quipped that “election to office seems to kill all sense of duty in some men.”
While Raddon and others didn’t wish to see hardworking businessmen fail, they encouraged saloon owners to operate “good, clean business” after the bill’s passage. Throughout 1917, many saloon owners repurposed their bars as pool halls and “soft drink parlors,” most of which nonetheless continued to sell alcohol after Prohibition went into effect.
Even though Prohibition passed in Utah, the WCTU and others did not view their work as finished. As Mrs. C.A. Walker, president of the Utah chapter, wrote to local papers, “to develop a higher civic conscience and a greater sense of moral responsibility…among all classes is perhaps the most important work before us.”
Join us in this column over the next couple weeks for a look at Prohibition in Park City.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Park City and Summit County make the Park Record's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
A longtime Park City activist expressed worries that another Winter Olympics could exacerbate some of the issues the community as of today struggles to address. Rich Wyman’s comments were some of the only public statements in recent months addressing concerns about the efforts to stage a second Games.