The Summit County Commission has made numerous attempts to work with Summit Water Distribution Company. To correct the public record regarding Mr. Stuart A. Knowles’ (Summit Water Distribution Company Board Member) comments in the guest editorial in Saturday’s Park Record:
1. I asked Bill Brown, local community activist and all-around good guy, to intercede and act as an intermediary to initiate settlement negotiations with Summit Water shortly after I was elected to office.
Bill and I, with the assistance of our legal staff, submitted to Mr. Bob Campbell, attorney for Summit Water, a stipulation and participation agreement, which attempted to set aside the pending lawsuit to allow settlement discussions. It contained the following: "Whereas, the parties desire to engage in discussions, settlement negotiations and the exchange of information pursuant to Rule 408 of the Utah Rules of Evidence, freely and without prejudice, in order to explore alternatives to litigation that might result in resolution of the disputes between the parties from which this litigation arises "
3. Bill’s transmittal letter of March 17, 2003 to Mr. Campbell stated in part, "We want to be able to listen, talk, exchange information and explain alternatives outside of the current litigation."
4. Our signed stipulation letter was never returned to us by Mr. Campbell, nor were any modifications to the agreement suggested by Summit Water.
5. I initiated a meeting with Summit Water to hear their side of the anti-trust litigation and to discuss possible settlement solutions on March 28, 2003. Present at the meeting were various representatives of Summit Water including Hy Saunders and Bob Campbell. I represented the county, along with Bill Brown, Jim Carbine, general manager of Mountain Regional Water, and our legal counsel, George Hunt.
6. At my urging, a second meeting was held with Summit Water representatives on April 10, 2003. Commissioner Ken Woolstenhulme attended the meeting representing the county.
7. In late June of 2003, I scheduled another meeting with Summit Water. Prior to the meeting, the county was blindsided by yet another lawsuit from Summit Water, naming Commissioner Woolstenhulme and me as individual defendants. (This action was later dismissed in favor of Summit County by order of the District Court on Dec. 29, 2003 and affirmed on appeal on Feb. 17, 2005.)
8. It was clear from this legal action that Summit Water was not willing to seriously discuss settlement options.
9. The county decisions leading to the Summit Water anti-trust litigation, whether right or wrong, took place years before Commissioner Woolstenhulme and I took office.
10. It takes two to negotiate. The county always has been and continues to be open to legitimate settlement discussions. We have taken the initiative in the past.
Mr. Knowles has a right to express his views. I only ask that in the future, he will make a stronger effort to get his facts straight.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Park City and Summit County make the Park Record's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
The Park City Planning Commission should vote down the PCMR base area development application unless free parking at the resort is guaranteed for local taxpayers, writes Stuart Goldner of Park Meadows.