Record editorial: Wohali vote means growth is at Coalville’s doorstep, whether residents want it or not
It was an outcome many vocal Coalville residents had been dreading.
On Monday evening, the Coalville City Council voted 3-1 to provide initial approval to the proposed Wohali development, a second-home community with plans for 570 residential units, 130 nightly rentals, 27 holes of golf, a spa and other amenities.
The developers still must clear a few hurdles — including negotiating a development agreement — before they can put shovels in the ground, but the decision seemed to signal the end of a long chapter of Coalville’s history.
The exact ways in which the town, where people have long taken pride in its rural, small-town character, will change in the coming years and decades remain to be seen. But it seems almost certain now that major change is coming.
It’s a fate many people who live in Coalville — some whose families have been there for generations — have indicated they were hoping to avoid.
The City Council was in the unenviable position of having to decide an issue that could define the community going forward. The members who voted for it appeared to have valid reasons. A few of them indicated protecting the rights of the landowner was a key factor in their decision. Another said she couldn’t ignore the potential economic benefits the development could bring into a town that does not have a large tax base.
But some residents — at least those who provided several hours of public input at recent City Council meetings — are vehemently opposed to Wohali. Now they are left to ponder what their town will look like in 10 years, or in the decade after that, and wonder if it will be the kind of place where they’ll still want to live.
It was not surprising that one of the common refrains of the opposition was that they don’t want to become another Park City.
In Park City, many benefits have accompanied the transformational growth that has taken place over the last three decades. But it has also brought problems the town is confronting today, such as sky-high housing costs and a concern that the character of the community is fading.
More than a few longtime Parkites yearn for the sleepy town they once knew.
In Park City, though, many folks in the pre-Olympic era aspired to become a world-class resort destination. The people who have spoken up in Coalville, in contrast, seem to have little desire to invite growth.
After Monday’s vote, it is now at their doorstep — whether they like it or not.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Park City and Summit County make the Park Record's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Our view: Rather than getting the redistricting process Utahns supported for in 2018, we’ll have to settle for the option lawmakers thought best. Voters deserved better.