Following Aaron Rodgers’ high-profile injury, is it time to rethink our usage of turf?
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you have surely seen or heard about New York Jets superstar Aaron Rodgers’ Achilles tear from Monday night, Sept. 11. The four-time NFL MVP and Super Bowl champion had the Jets fan base roaring heading into the season-opener, which ended after four unmemorable snaps.
Rodgers was wrestled down on his fourth drop back by Buffalo Bills edge rusher Leonard Floyd, where you could see Rodgers’ foot get caught a moment too long in the MetLife Stadium, rain-dampened artificial turf. An MRI Tuesday confirmed what public opinion suspected: This moment had cost Rodgers his season.
Immediately after the injury and confirmation, the debate surrounding artificial turf versus natural grass fields was renewed. Rodgers’ longtime Packers teammate David Bakhtiari even tweeted the following: https://x.com/DavidBakhtiari/status/1701402938642415783?s=20, expressing his disdain for the League’s usage of the playing surface.
The NFL currently boasts 15 turf fields across 30 stadiums, which cut costs and allow the stadiums to play host to a variety of events, including Taylor Swift tour stops. Mounting high-profile injuries like Rodgers’ and discussions over whether similar superstars like soccer’s Lionel Messi should even partake in games on it have recently been picking up steam.
The National Football League Players Association cited American Journal of Sports Medicine data this spring, which showed the artificial surfaces’ definite higher rates of injury compared to natural grass. These rates aren’t the only problem with the surface, either, which is incredibly stiff and often contains cancer-causing chemicals. The Carolina Panthers even failed the “Clegg” field hardness test ahead of a game they played last season and the EPA published findings in 2019 showing fields featuring crumb rubber (the common black bits component on these artificial fields) to contain chemicals known to cause cancers, impaired reproductive development and more.
The majority of prep and college fields are now using artificial turf fields due to their aforementioned ability to cut costs. One of these programs includes Park City, whose Dozier Field is outfitted with an artificial turf surface, and whose baseball and softball programs relatively-recently launched a fundraising campaign to hopefully do the same.
Miners Athletic Director Jamie Sheetz touched briefly upon the advantages of artificial turf for his programs, given their locations. Sheetz said in an email, “We don’t have data (as it relates to playing injuries), but we do like having turf for this climate and where the playing seasons fall.” Their baseball and softball teams will look to break ground on these new artificial diamonds if they secure the near-$3 million in funds they’re seeking.
These fields certainly cut costs and allow for winter weather schools like Park City to better manage their athletics calendars. But there may be drawbacks to consider, as well. A growing number of cities, such as Boston, are beginning to ban the future installation of such playing surfaces, which may merit attention where artificial turf currently is popular.
Next up for Coach Winkworth and his Miners will be the Ogden Tigers, who they’ll travel to face Wednesday evening as part of an in-season tournament.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Park City and Summit County make the Park Record's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.